1
Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

MERCENARIES (in response to Sirhumpalot's thread)Follow

#102 Sep 29 2005 at 4:38 PM Rating: Decent
TheBarrister wrote:

One person ACTUALLY said they would NOW help Hajpoj, FOR FREE, due to the fact that all the big, bad meanies in this thread (which he started, proudly trumpeting the fact that he became a "merc" by taking advantage of a lack of tanks looking at his level) are picking on him. That person is Dreyvin.


Haha, you make me sound like I came galloping in on a steed to rescue a fair maiden.


I don't see anything wrong with what he did, so obviously I'm going to defend him. I find it so weird that everyone has this image of "OMG GUY CHARGED FOR XP PARTY," when there were no problems in game.

Taking advantage of something doesn't always carry a negative connotation, and it shouldn't in this case, because no one was harmed or upset by his actions. They all got some XP, and the party was worthwile to him because he made something out of it in a situation where he could care less about grinding some more xp in.



EDIT: You're making this really hard for me to not double post.

TheBarrister wrote:
Dreyviin wrote:
Dreyviin wrote:


Being an *** will ruin your reputation faster than having a party who agrees to pay you a miniscule 20k to do something you don't want to do.




Fixed. Elite wasn't the best term, I guess.



In the minds of the majority of posters on this thread, being an *** and adverstising to be a party member for gil are one an the same.

Kinda like going and helping someone for free who was an *** to others would be. That would be being an *** too. That's precisely what you offered to Hajpoj. Same thing as people who party with gilsellers -- no different. People are judged by the company they keep as well.



Hajpoj wasn't being an *** to anyone. Everyone went home happy in his situation.

I'm not being an *** for defending him, either. In fact, I feel more obligated to help him just because you guys are beating down on him so hard. I don't feel he deserves that, regardless of what you think.

Opinions are like ********, and your side is ******** all over him. I respect your opinion that charging for XP is wrong, but I'm not trying to bash you on it.

The only negative thing I've said towards you was that you came off as a jerk with a comment like "Said the 65 Bard to the 75 THF," which is a jerky thing to say.

Edited, Thu Sep 29 17:46:39 2005 by Dreyviin

Edited, Thu Sep 29 17:47:50 2005 by Dreyviin
#103 Sep 29 2005 at 4:41 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,387 posts
That's odd, because all the mercenary magazines and 'mercenary lifestyle' hype would say different. I'd think mercenaries, especially the type that engage in war and all, loved what they did. People who do things so well and enjoy it so much they run out of wars of their own to fight and hire themselves out to other wars. Mercenary lawyers that will, for enough gil, pull out all the stops and be as lawyery as they possibly can. Etc, etc, etc. (imagines a team of mercenary accountants. Ties around their heads Rocky-style and double-holstered adding machines.)

See when I think of Mercenary I think of someone who's saying, "I am the best you can get at this, and if you want my expertise, you'll have to pay me."

When I think of, "I don't want to do this but if you give me enough money I will," that seems whorish to me.
#104 Sep 29 2005 at 4:44 PM Rating: Decent
Aloof wrote:
That's odd, because all the mercenary magazines and 'mercenary lifestyle' hype would say different. I'd think mercenaries, especially the type that engage in war and all, loved what they did. People who do things so well and enjoy it so much they run out of wars of their own to fight and hire themselves out to other wars. Mercenary lawyers that will, for enough gil, pull out all the stops and be as lawyery as they possibly can. Etc, etc, etc. (imagines a team of mercenary accountants. Ties around their heads Rocky-style and double-holstered adding machines.)

See when I think of Mercenary I think of someone who's saying, "I am the best you can get at this, and if you want my expertise, you'll have to pay me."

When I think of, "I don't want to do this but if you give me enough money I will," that seems whorish to me.



What about Cloud!? He didn't give a crap about the lifestream, but he was a Merc' and willing to help Avalanche for a price. ;P

I don't know, I see a difference between Freelancer and Mercenary, and Mercenarys are kind of whoreish. But I just kind of expect that from the term.
#105 Sep 29 2005 at 4:45 PM Rating: Default
***
1,410 posts
Quote:
You're right.
That's all we agree on: you were inaccurate. Put differently, you lied. Of course, you choose to dig deeper instead of apologizing:
Quote:
One of those people, you, avoided the question multiple times. Those three people are yourself (MJS the Venerable), Altdeer and EarthShaker.
*laughs at you* Oh, is that what I'm doing? I don't know enough to answer the question definitively, although I'm sure my awareness of the guy's mercenary episodes would be some sort of negative; but it's none of your business anyway. Stick to your own server and mind your own business.
Quote:
If you were really all that interested in things not being other people's business, you wouldn't be posting in the first place so that is a pretty lame argument.
Non sequitur. You just want everyone to agree with you, unreservedly. When they don't either agree or disagree, you accuse them of "avoiding." Lying is one of your few strong suits; diplomacy and logic are not among them.

Goodbye.

#106 Sep 29 2005 at 4:46 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
4,864 posts
Dreyviin wrote:


The only negative thing I've said towards you was that you came off as a jerk with a comment like "Said the 65 Bard to the 75 THF," which is a jerky thing to say.


I explained the reason I said that. It's in a post on the middle of the 2nd page of this thread.
____________________________
Carbuncle


#107 Sep 29 2005 at 4:47 PM Rating: Decent
**
423 posts
Oh god here, from websters.com

mercenary

adj 1: marked by materialism [syn: materialistic, worldly-minded] 2: used of soldiers hired by a foreign army [syn: mercenary(a), freelance(a)] 3: profit oriented; "a commercial book"; "preached a mercantile and militant patriotism"- John Buchan; "a mercenary enterprise"; "a moneymaking business" [syn: mercantile, moneymaking(a)] n : a person hired to fight for another country than their own [syn: soldier of fortune]


I don't see any reference to weather you are good at, or like or dislike the fight you are engaged in.

#108 Sep 29 2005 at 4:48 PM Rating: Default
TheBarrister wrote:
Dreyviin wrote:


The only negative thing I've said towards you was that you came off as a jerk with a comment like "Said the 65 Bard to the 75 THF," which is a jerky thing to say.


I explained the reason I said that. It's in a post on the middle of the 2nd page of this thread.



That post did little to prove otherwise.

edit:
In fact, it seems like you misunderstood Tray(sp, not bothering to look back)'s post.

(S)he was saying that there are plenty of people desperate enough that would willingly pay (bribe) someone to join their party, especially for a tiny fee of 20k. Not that there are plenty of people charging.

Edited, Thu Sep 29 17:58:51 2005 by Dreyviin
#109 Sep 29 2005 at 4:49 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
See when I think of Mercenary I think of someone who's saying, "I am the best you can get at this, and if you want my expertise, you'll have to pay me."


Not that it matters, we all gained a level in a 1 hour period and I never lost hate once and there were no deaths.

Not to mention I did have the best possible gear at that level: http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/profile.xml?101456 and I used Tav Tacos.

I feel I was the best possible Tank I could be.
#110 Sep 29 2005 at 4:54 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,387 posts
Yeah, but it also says nothing about being hired when you're actually unwilling to fight. And you have to admit that however Webster's defines it, actual mercenaries-- like those who support Soldier of Fortune magazine and similar publications-- prefer to a portrayal as adventurers and top folks in their craft.

And really, would you even bother hiring a mercenary who wasn't any good?

Meh. Well, all that aside, not CARING whether you fight or not==> mercenary. Not wanting to fight and doing it anyway for money ==> *****.
#111 Sep 29 2005 at 4:54 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,587 posts
Whether getting paid to be in an exp party makes you a "Mercenary" by definition or not is really irrelavant. It still makes you look like a jerk in many people eyes, regardless.
#112 Sep 29 2005 at 4:56 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
4,864 posts
MJS the Venerable wrote:

Non sequitur. You just want everyone to agree with you, unreservedly.


No I don't. I just wanted an answer to the question. Not a roundabout avoidance of said question.


MJS the Venerable wrote:

When they don't either agree or disagree, you accuse them of "avoiding."


When someone ask you a question, and you instead answer questions that were not asked, that is called avoiding. There is no accusation but the blatant revelation of the truth. If you didn't want to answer the question Acepod or myself posed, i.e., "Would you help someone for free or would you charge them, having knowledge that they charged other people simply to be in their exp party?"

You have choosen repetitively not to answer the question, hence why I grouped you in the "would help for free" category. So far all you have said is "I don't know enough to answer the question definitively". Well, I offer that you have all the knowledge you need to now. You know that he actively searched for other tanks seeking or available at his level. You know that he apparently didn't want to exp although he was totally fine with receiving the SAME exp as others did, FOR FREE, while they PAID HIM for it. You know that he started a thread, basically bragging about it. He even proudly wears the badge of some Merc Paladin and says so at the end of his original post. What more do you need to know??? Either a simple yes or no will do. If it's none of my business, don't post here. Ironically you had not witty lie yourself except to call me out as lying being one of my strong suits (so I mixed up 1 with 2, I admitted it) and insulting me by saying diplomacy and logic aren't my strong suits?

Well intelligence isn't your strong suit. It doesn't take more than several years in school to decide whether you would freely offer help to a known profiteer or not. I'm sorry you "don't know enough to answer the question". You probably never will.







Edited, Thu Sep 29 18:08:17 2005 by TheBarrister
____________________________
Carbuncle


#113 Sep 29 2005 at 4:56 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
It still makes you look like a jerk in many people eyes, regardless.


You see, it keeps going back to being an attack on ethics.



EDIT:
Quote:
Whether getting paid to be in an exp party makes you a "Mercenary" by definition or not is really irrelavant.


What are you talking about? This whole thread is based on how I became a Mercenary in an isolated incident.

Edited, Thu Sep 29 18:10:09 2005 by Hajpoj
#114 Sep 29 2005 at 4:58 PM Rating: Good
****
5,587 posts
Hajpoj wrote:
Quote:
It still makes you look like a jerk in many people eyes, regardless.


You see, it keeps going back to being an attack on ethics.


Just speaking the truth, and you can see it from this thread. You can't deny some people just don't like the idea of it, therefore look down on you for it. You can do whatever you want in this game. Just be prepared to deal with the consequences when you know it goes against some other people's ethics. If you don't care what others think of you in the game, that's your perogative. Just don't expect to convince others to change their ethics to accomodate your behavior.

Edited, Thu Sep 29 18:05:20 2005 by jmakovec
#115 Sep 29 2005 at 5:03 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Just speaking the truth, and you can see it from this thread. You can't deny some people just don't like the idea of it, therefore look down on you for it. You can do whatever you want in this game. Just be prepared to deal with the consequences when you know it goes against some other people's ethics.


Thats not truth, just an opinion or agreement. Opinions, or the numbers of agreement in an opinion does not make it truth.

You all seem to know, or assume what my in-game reputation is.
The truth is, YOU DON'T.

You don't know who my friends are, you don't know what Linkshells I am associated with.
You don't know who I really am, only an isolated incident to apparanetly judge me as a whole by? You don't know My situation.
#116 Sep 29 2005 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
****
5,587 posts
Hajpoj wrote:
Quote:
Just speaking the truth, and you can see it from this thread. You can't deny some people just don't like the idea of it, therefore look down on you for it. You can do whatever you want in this game. Just be prepared to deal with the consequences when you know it goes against some other people's ethics.


Thats not truth, just an opinion or agreement. Opinions, or the numbers of agreement in an opinion does not make it truth.

You all seem to know, or assume what my in-game reputation is.
The truth is, YOU DON'T.

You don't know who my friends are, you don't know what Linkshells I am associated with.
You don't know who I really am, only an isolated incident to apparanetly judge me as a whole by? You don't know My situation.


Maybe you need to reread my statement. I'm not saying that 'being paid to exp is bad' is an absolute truth. The truth I'm referring to is that many players have an opinion of that type of thing being bad, and will therefore look down upon you for it. Just like there are players having the opinion that it's not. Notice I said it makes you look like a jerk in "many" (not all) players eyes. If it didn't, you wouldn't have so many negative responses in this thread.

Most people here really don't care who your friends are, what LS's you are associated with, or who you really are. They do however think charging someone to "let them have you in an exp party" is a fairly low thing to do in the game, whether it's an isolated incident or not because you made it an issue for them by bringing it up in their forum.

My guess is the majority of people on your server never even new this even happened, so there are no opinions to be concerned about since you only did it once so your reputation is a non-issue at this point. Now that you made this situation known to a large audience, you are going to get a lot of opinions on it, and maybe even some negative views of your reputation because of it. I would be willing to bet if this was a habitual thing for you, your reputation would be affected. Like I said, behave like you want, but be prepared to deal with the consequences of you actions. If your actions don't affect many people, then you won't have many consequences. Nobody "likes" paying to have someone in their exp party. Those people did it because they were desperate, which you took advantage of.

Edited, Thu Sep 29 18:23:50 2005 by jmakovec
#117REDACTED, Posted: Sep 29 2005 at 5:22 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Well then truly, It really comes down to my own ethics correct?
#118 Sep 29 2005 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
**
609 posts
With that logic you could say that it's in your ethics to kill somebody therefore making it legal to you to kill somebody. I think that's the logic most serial killers have.
#119 Sep 29 2005 at 5:26 PM Rating: Decent
Charging people for you to be in their party is being a flat-out pri[/b]ck. No Ifs, ands or buts about it. You are a pri[b]ck. Don't want to party? Don't party. The fact that you got XP for it as well is more extorsion than anything. You are probably the same pri[/b]ck that charged that poor guy for his subjob item. Sh[b]it like this will kill this game faster than anything. "Pay me to be in your XP party while I level too..." Lick nuts Bit[b][/b]ch!
#120 Sep 29 2005 at 5:27 PM Rating: Default
VorakX wrote:
With that logic you could say that it's in your ethics to kill somebody therefore making it legal to you to kill somebody. I think that's the logic most serial killers have.



In that analogy, abiding by the TOS would be the same as abiding by real life laws, wouldn't it?
#121 Sep 29 2005 at 5:30 PM Rating: Good
****
5,587 posts
Hajpoj wrote:
Well then truly, It really comes down to my own ethics correct?

If what I do, does not violate my own ethics, I should have no concern, because the people against me would Violate my own ethics, therefore truly making those people irrelevant to me.


Agreed. As long as you don't care about associating with those people you see as irrelevant, then there is no problem. It's only a problem if you care what "everyone" thinks.
#122REDACTED, Posted: Sep 29 2005 at 5:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Well then yes, they believe it is right to kill someone. They still kill don't they?
#123REDACTED, Posted: Sep 29 2005 at 5:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Precisely. I have lived my life indepently of what society expects of me.
#124 Sep 29 2005 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
**
609 posts
I don't see how my analogy was radical at all. You just defended the minds of serial killers for your argument over your right to charge 20k.

I can assure you that most people in the civilized world are not against killing because of the consequences but because it is morally wrong. Society has deemed it morally wrong, and society is the prevailing voice over a few goons who live in their own little worlds.

Now here is the dilemma we have.

If you really didn't want to play you would not have a partied, period. You could have farmed and made more probably. I fail to see how a party should reimburse you for time you spent with them. After all, you did get experience points and if everybody leveled then you probably did as well.
#125REDACTED, Posted: Sep 29 2005 at 5:43 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) ^^ read the edit in my post
#126 Sep 29 2005 at 5:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,400 posts
I love the whole "free spirit thinker" vibe I'm getting from you.

It reminds me of when I used to work in the mall, and I would see all the teenagers dressed like "punks" with their anarchy patches and hair spiked with Elmer's glue.

"I"M DIFFERENT!" they would say.

So different that all of them looked EXACTLY THE SAME.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 206 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (206)