1
Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

POL System Scan Privacy Issues? OP Updated 5:39am EST Mar 9Follow

#127 Mar 08 2007 at 7:14 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,197 posts
Argonaut wrote:
Probably said a few hundred times already, but what the hell is biting your balls!

Reasons for someone to be against POL scanning the processes running:

1) They have hacks.
2) They have hacks.
3) They have windower.
4) They have hacks.
5) They are looking at kiddy ****.
6) They are playing WoW.

Seriously though, if you have a 100% genuine version of your OS and the software that you run, and you run nothing but FFXI, plus maybe MSN messenger/AOL/ICQ in the background, and also a handful of other apps that are to do with drivers and so on... then what are you scared about? You are playing their game, you agree to allow them to do what ever they want when you sign up. It is in their best interests not to ***** over their customers (this can be debated in other sectors, but we'll leave it at that for this thread), if they think that by scanning the system for running programs or programs that may effect gameplay so that they can clean up the game, then good for them.

Anyone that's against the cleaning up of this game is on par with the RMT.

Does anyone know for sure if they actually send the full program or files, or if they do the smart thing and just send program signatures and MD5/CRC hashes? If it's the later then what the hell are you worrying about?

581867110be1cc5686aeb398404de625 does not equal "ZOMG THIS GUY HAS A HOT CHICK DESKTOP BACKGROUND"
F029CA7D is not the CRC32 value of "Configuration_ReadMe.htm"


Reasons to be against it scanning my processes and memory without disclosure or my consent.

1) I have legal rights.
2) I have legal rights.
3) I have legal rights.
4) I have legal rights.
5) I have legal rights.
6) You may not care about waivering yours, but... oh yes, I have legal rights.

Before you posted, did you research precedent? Did you phone POL? Did you phone a lawyer? Did you phone the CAOPP? No?

Go get educated.
#128 Mar 08 2007 at 7:16 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,400 posts
Quote:
Welcome to Square-Enix.com (the "Site")! These terms of use ("Site Terms") apply to your access to and use of our Site, so please read them carefully.


Nowhere does it say Playonline.com, FFXI, POL (the application), Tetra Master or anything else of that nature.

Edited, Mar 8th 2007 10:18pm by Erawyn
#129 Mar 08 2007 at 7:16 PM Rating: Good
**
290 posts
Pawkeshup wrote:
http://www.square-enix.com/na/about/

General Privacy policy, which is also found in the front of every FFXI manual.

Also:

http://www.square-enix.com/na/privacy/

And the forums listed are the LS communities. Forums, communities, posts. Gee, those fall under that... what other website interaction is there?

OH WAIT! There's this whole interactive web-based thing which shows me the latest news and updates, links to their service and support site... OH it's a flash/java-based program which acts as a browser I have installed on my computer...

Yea. As previously stated, crawl back beneath the bridge privacy trolls. Your argument holds as much water as a sieve.

By installing ANY program, you accept the terms of agreement that is associated with that, ALL the terms. And those terms always include data collection. You "opt out" by UNINSTALLING!

And you know what, if you're that upset, please DO!

See, I can type in caps too.


Going to use simple words, it defines their websites terms of service. And the usage of their site.

If you actually read http://www.square-enix.com/na/about/ nothing in that document is about licensing POL/FFXI/TetraMaster, just their website. This is what people are trying to tell you. I just had to read the definition pretext to figure that out.
#130 Mar 08 2007 at 7:22 PM Rating: Good
No one is interested in blocking POL from scanning your process'??
#131 Mar 08 2007 at 7:23 PM Rating: Default
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Have you ever actually looked at the site?

Left side, bottom. This is a subsidary site, thereby anyone viewing it is bound by the terms and conditions of the parent site.

And as for my "patriotic" nature? It is a game you idiot! You DO realize that ALL your conversations ARE monitor in it, RIGHT, Mr. Privacy Freak? Your chat logs exist on their server. By installing and using it, you wave your right to private communication.

Hey, here's an idea. Pikko, where are your TOS?
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#132 Mar 08 2007 at 7:25 PM Rating: Good
Pawk you are quickly turning into one of the biggest idiot's on this site you do realize that right? Everything you are saying holds ABSOLUTELY no value in this conversation.
#133 Mar 08 2007 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
jegzus the Meaningless wrote:
No one is interested in blocking POL from scanning your process'??


We're more interested in finding out where you live now that we know your name, Justin Martini! >:O
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#134 Mar 08 2007 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
As it states under my posts, "Effort, PA". Smiley: grin
#135 Mar 08 2007 at 7:29 PM Rating: Default
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
The saddest part is how wrong you are.

You have no privacy in the game. You have none on their site. It's in their TOS. If you actually paid attention, you'd know that POL is using the site for content. Hence why when your connection breaks it all goes the default red colour. Yank your ethernet cable out while in one section of POL and go to another. You'll notice it doesn't work.

It's not resident on your machine, the content comes from the site. They have the right to monitor anything you transmit. You transmit all those "scanned files".

IE sends a lot of items out there.

So does a lot of your programs. You just don't realize it.
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#136 Mar 08 2007 at 7:29 PM Rating: Good
My crawl back under your bridge comment was directed at youssarian, not Arketa. Smiley: lol

I just had to finish my post like that because it feels good to **** people off now and again, especially when they act like they can show off their intelligence in an online forum (where no one has a clue how smart or dumb someone is except by interpreting their writing style).
#137 Mar 08 2007 at 7:33 PM Rating: Decent
**
705 posts
It only becomes an issue with privacy if SE decide to collect the data about what process is running on your machine. If it only scans for certain processes and then terminate POL if they're found, there is no 'privacy issue'.

'legal protection' against a programs scanning your registry and processes does not exist.






#138 Mar 08 2007 at 7:33 PM Rating: Good
After reading this thread all evening, I've decided to just play with Windower and leave Process Guard blocking POL's reading functions. They may just be scanning for bots and such or they may just be looking for statistics on how many people use windower or what kind of plugins people are using, but I figure if I get kicked from the game, they'll probably delete my character and I think that's the only way I'd ever stop playing and get a life again.

Good night.
#139 Mar 08 2007 at 7:34 PM Rating: Good
***
1,197 posts
Pawkeshup wrote:
The saddest part is how wrong you are.

You have no privacy in the game. You have none on their site. It's in their TOS. If you actually paid attention, you'd know that POL is using the site for content. Hence why when your connection breaks it all goes the default red colour. Yank your ethernet cable out while in one section of POL and go to another. You'll notice it doesn't work.

It's not resident on your machine, the content comes from the site. They have the right to monitor anything you transmit. You transmit all those "scanned files".

IE sends a lot of items out there.

So does a lot of your programs. You just don't realize it.


Yes, you're right. SEI does gather all of that information generated by the content in the POL viewer.

Oh yeah, except there's a difference. That's covered under "traffic data" and is acceptable under their current policies.

pol.exe scanning everything, however, is not.

But, since you're sooo right, you can explain to us how pol.exe needs to know that I'm running MSN, IE, Thudnerbird, and Adobe Photoshop and then transmit that data back to SEI while I go buy a pack of smokes.

Please, enlighten me/us. I'm sure Microsoft, Mozilla, and Adobe (respectively) would all also be interested to know that somehow, through some magical legal jargon, their programs all somehow fall under "within PlayOnline service".
#140 Mar 08 2007 at 7:35 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
Quote:
It's not resident on your machine, the content comes from the site. They have the right to monitor anything you transmit. You transmit all those "scanned files".


I don't know about you, but half of my programs don't transmit **** to POL. POL is the one going out and looking for stuff.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#141 Mar 08 2007 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
Anomandarake wrote:
It only becomes an issue with privacy if SE decide to collect the data about what process is running on your machine. If it only scans for certain processes and then terminate POL if they're found, there is no 'privacy issue'.

Just saw this after I posted my last comment. If that's what they were trying to do, I wish they'd have just told people what they were doing. It would have eliminated the need for this whole conversation.
#142 Mar 08 2007 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
It has to be sending information back to SE because there is nothing client side to make it close down POL if anything is found, or if you block the scan from happening.
#143 Mar 08 2007 at 7:48 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,901 posts
jegzus the Meaningless wrote:
It has to be sending information back to SE because there is nothing client side to make it close down POL if anything is found, or if you block the scan from happening.


Thank you for posting Jegzus. That is all. Please continue...
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#144 Mar 08 2007 at 7:48 PM Rating: Default
***
1,892 posts
Trying not to sound corny but, you also have the right to remain silent. Execute it please! You're just trying to stir up a useless storm, like those guys a while back that claimed that SE had bad Customer Service and were trying to sue them for loss of money. If I thought that SE was doing any wrong, yet I might be in the same boat, but what's scanning processes going to do? Tell them that I'm running Paint at 21:35?

And about doing the research and so on, no need. I know that I'm not in the wrong, so why worry?

If ever there was a thread worth of a dead horse icon, this would be it.

They are trying to clean up the game, so shut up or ship out.
#145 Mar 08 2007 at 7:54 PM Rating: Excellent
22 posts
I was able to dig this up for you. This is the Online Privacy Protection Act of 2003 - Business and Professions Code sections 22575-22579 for California.

BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE
SECTION 22575-22579

22575. (a) An operator of a commercial Web site or online service
that collects personally identifiable information through the
Internet about individual consumers residing in California who use
or visit its commercial Web site or online service shall
conspicuously post its privacy policy on its Web site, or in the case
of an operator of an online service, make that policy available in
accordance with paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 22577.
An operator shall be in violation of this subdivision only if the
operator fails to post its policy within 30 days after being
notified of noncompliance.
(b) The privacy policy required by subdivision (a) shall do all of
the following:
(1) Identify the categories of personally identifiable information
that the operator collects through the Web site or online service
about individual consumers who use or visit its commercial Web site
or online service and the categories of third-party persons or
entities with whom the operator may share that personally
identifiable information.
(2) If the operator maintains a process for an individual consumer
who uses or visits its commercial Web site or online service to
review and request changes to any of his or her personally
identifiable information that is collected through the Web site or
online service, provide a description of that process.
(3) Describe the process by which the operator notifies consumers
who use or visit its commercial Web site or online service of
material changes to the operator's privacy policy for that Web site
or online service.
(4) Identify its effective date.



22576. An operator of a commercial Web site or online service that
collects personally identifiable information through the Web site or
online service from individual consumers who use or visit the
commercial Web site or online service and who reside in California
shall be in violation of this section if the operator fails to comply
with the provisions of Section 22575 or with the provisions of its
posted privacy policy in either of the following ways:
(a) Knowingly and willfully.
(b) Negligently and materially.



22577. For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions
apply:
(a) The term "personally identifiable information" means
individually identifiable information about an individual consumer
collected online by the operator from that individual and maintained
by the operator in an accessible form, including any of the
following:
(1) A first and last name.
(2) A home or other physical address, including street name and
name of a city or town.
(3) An e-mail address.
(4) A telephone number.
(5) A social security number.
(6) Any other identifier that permits the physical or online
contacting of a specific individual.
(7) Information concerning a user that the Web site or online
service collects online from the user and maintains in personally
identifiable form in combination with an identifier described in this
subdivision.
(b) The term "conspicuously post" with respect to a privacy policy
shall include posting the privacy policy through any of the
following:
(1) A Web page on which the actual privacy policy is posted if the
Web page is the homepage or first significant page after entering
the Web site.
(2) An icon that hyperlinks to a Web page on which the actual
privacy policy is posted, if the icon is located on the homepage or
the first significant page after entering the Web site, and if the
icon contains the word "privacy." The icon shall also use a color
that contrasts with the background color of the Web page or is
otherwise distinguishable.
(3) A text link that hyperlinks to a Web page on which the actual
privacy policy is posted, if the text link is located on the homepage
or first significant page after entering the Web site, and if the
text link does one of the following:
(A) Includes the word "privacy."
(B) Is written in capital letters equal to or greater in size than
the surrounding text.
(C) Is written in larger type than the surrounding text, or in
contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same
size, or set off from the surrounding text of the same size by
symbols or other marks that call attention to the language.
(4) Any other functional hyperlink that is so displayed that a
reasonable person would notice it.
(5) In the case of an online service, any other reasonably
accessible means of making the privacy policy available for consumers
of the online service.
(c) The term "operator" means any person or entity that owns a
Web site located on the Internet or an online service that collects
and maintains personally identifiable information from a consumer
residing in California who uses or visits the Web site or online
service if the Web site or online service is operated for commercial
purposes. It does not include any third party that operates, hosts,
or manages, but does not own, a Web site or online service on the
owner's behalf or by processing information on behalf of the owner.
(d) The term "consumer" means any individual who seeks or
acquires, by purchase or lease, any goods, services, money, or credit
for personal, family, or household purposes.



22578. It is the intent of the Legislature that this chapter is a
matter of statewide concern. This chapter supersedes and preempts
all rules, regulations, codes, ordinances, and other laws adopted by
a city, county, city and county, municipality, or local agency
regarding the posting of a privacy policy on an Internet Web site.




22579. This chapter shall become operative on July 1, 2004.

I totaly support you in this Arketa, from a lawyer stand point and from what SEI Terms of Service states, what they are doing is illegal.

I could have bolded the important parts.. But I would like people to actualy red this... Read... >.>


Edited, Mar 8th 2007 10:56pm by Talzhemir

Edited, Mar 9th 2007 12:49am by Talzhemir
#146 Mar 08 2007 at 7:56 PM Rating: Good
Argo, so they aren't doing anything wrong by delving into peoples PC's for no reason at all? They are breaking the law in the US and that's ok because it is going to stop RMT? (not even close)

I really don't understand how some of you can sit back and say, "I don't care that a game company is trying to retrieve information about me that has nothing to do with their game." It really makes me sad that people will let themselves be violated because they enjoy a game that much.
#147 Mar 08 2007 at 7:58 PM Rating: Decent
It's Just a Flesh Wound
******
22,702 posts
My lolicon is for me only! No pol.exe shall take that away from me! Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#148 Mar 08 2007 at 7:58 PM Rating: Good
***
1,197 posts
jegzus the Meaningless wrote:
Argo, so they aren't doing anything wrong by delving into peoples PC's for no reason at all? They are breaking the law in the US and that's ok because it is going to stop RMT? (not even close)

I really don't understand how some of you can sit back and say, "I don't care that a game company is trying to retrieve information about me that has nothing to do with their game." It really makes me sad that people will let themselves be violated because they enjoy a game that much.


You are also extended an open invitation to have dinner at my table :)

As I stated before (paraphrased now) My rights violated != "this update is full of WIN" so it's okay
#149 Mar 08 2007 at 8:00 PM Rating: Good
Talzhemir you win the Smiley: cookie of the day! Thank you sir for posting that information.

And for those of you who will say they do not collect any personal information by scanning process', just look at the screen shot I posted. That is how Deadgye knew my full name because it is in the command string of one of the process' that was scanned.

Edit: Spelled Talzhemir wrong. Sorry Smiley: frown.

Also Arketa I've been behind you 100% on this since last night and will continue to stand up for our rights. Also thank you for the invitation, how does 8pm Saturday night sound? Smiley: lol

Edited, Mar 8th 2007 11:03pm by jegzus
#150 Mar 08 2007 at 8:00 PM Rating: Default
**
359 posts
Do we know exactly what they are looking at/for? Does anyone have any idea how deep this little scan goes?

No.

For all we know SE isn't even logging the names of the processes your PC is running, and it could save the log for the version check on the next update. It may be looking at FFXI player's PCs to get an idea about average system power to implement a SE windower or some other random ****. The fact is nobody took apart this scanning program so nobody knows exactly what it's doing and what exactly it's looking at, logging and trasmitting.

While I TOTALLY agree with being informed about my computer being profiled I also don't think SE is a bunch of game ***** trying to get dirt on us all.

On a side note how many people have ever been banned for running
"only" windower with no plugins running such as TParty, Distance, IME etc....?
If SE banned all the windower users that do or don't use the plugins they would kill FFXI and kill off a big source of income that they milk every month from all of us.
#151 Mar 08 2007 at 8:02 PM Rating: Excellent
22 posts
Also Arketa, you can contact State Senator Robert Nichols – 512-463-0103
http://www.nichols.senate.state.tx.us/

Thats Texas's state representitive.

Or you can contact Judge David Holstein Henderson County Judge.. :D

http://www.co.henderson.tx.us/ips/cms/countyoffices/
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 238 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (238)