Quote:
That's a little short-sighted and exaggerated, I think ;P do you truly think they're stupid enough to handle the process that way? Just because we all think there's a better way to do things doesn't mean they're THAT bad.
Square has no interest in banning paying customers, it impacts their bottom line. Even if the automated system hits a mere 5% false positive, with how many accounts are banned, you're looking at losing hundreds and hundreds of legit accounts because someone got lazy.
Square has no interest in banning paying customers, it impacts their bottom line. Even if the automated system hits a mere 5% false positive, with how many accounts are banned, you're looking at losing hundreds and hundreds of legit accounts because someone got lazy.
The short answer is, yes, they quite potentially are stupid enough to handle the process that way. Saying they won't do something because it affects their bottom line assumes that they automatically know what's best for their bottom line. You can't assume the right hand knows exactly what the left hand is doing. Such is the nature of bureaucracy.
To make matters worse, they are dealing with contradictory goals. They want to hold on to their subscribers, yes, but they also want to eliminate RMT. To that end they create a Special Task Force whose primary purpose is to stop RMT. They have the ability to investigate and the authority to ban. They are, to the players, a faceless, anonymous organization that acts from behind closed doors and whose only accountability is to their own bosses.
And the real problem is, their own bosses may be completely blind as to what is actually going on in the game. The people they rely upon for this information are quite likely the same people that are doing the bannings in the first place: the STF. For the July 6 bannings, the STF will release a report saying that they banned x number of people for RMT, eliminated y gil from circulation, and all is well in the world.
In an earlier post, either in this thread or another, I referred to the STF as "gestapo-like". I wasn't being dramatic. It's a useful metaphor. These are the problems inherent when you have a single group of people responsible for being the police, the judge, the jury, and the executioner when it comes to the players. When that group makes a mistake, there's nobody to call them on it.
Unfortunately this is why the scenario of the STF member wanting to go home early, saying "***** it", and just banning everyone flagged by their automated software is entirely plausible. Yes, it adversely affects their bottom line. Yes, it damages their reputation as a company. But what does this guy care about any of that? His only job is to hunt down and kill RMT. And because he's likely the very same guy that the bosses go to when they get complaints that innocent players were banned, he can just say "I'm 100% sure that everyone who was banned was involved in RMT." Who is there to call him on it? He can just say what he needs to say to get the bosses off his back and take an early 3 martini lunch break.
I don't think that's the most likely scenario, mind you. Given the escalation of RMT tells and the degree to which they make and made S/E and the STF objects of ridicule amongst the player base for their inability to stop them, it's entirely likely that there was considerable pressure was applied on the STF to step up their game. Of course that increases the risk of innocent players being hit with the banstick, as clearly happened in this case. If the mayor of a city pressures the police to crack down on crime, you expect a rise in brutality complaints. It's just the nature of the beast.
And unfortunately, because S/E is a company veiled in completely ridiculous shrouds of secrecy that has absolutely zero meaningful fan interaction, the only recourse of the wrongly banned players is to beg for mercy from the very same people that banned them in the first place, under the slim hope that they will be willing to admit they made a mistake, or somehow (probably via negative publicity associated with the bannings) force the bosses to apply pressure to the STF to reverse the wrongful bannings.
I believe that people will not want to play FFXIV if they learn that the company will ban you after years of work spent building your character for absolutely no reason, via a system that offers you essentially no appeal, no direct feedback from the company itself (except for a few worthless customer support reps who might as well be bots for their scripted responses), and not even a concrete reason for your ban apart from lumping you in to an enormous, generic category.
That is our only real leverage here, but it should not be underestimated. S/E was willing to change the mechanics of some of their highest-profile HNM's due to a single bad headline.
Edited, Jul 8th 2009 8:50am by MagicideAsura