1
Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Taj hacks 9 accounts, steals millionsFollow

#177 Sep 27 2007 at 8:45 AM Rating: Decent
TheCastle wrote:
Quote:
This is what happens when you kiss somebody's *** that much.


This is what happens when you give random @#%^ing people your @#%^ing account information you mother @#%^ing morons. This isn't even cool because he hacked it or did something interesting. This is just childish and retarded on so many levels. Hell I wouldn't even use the word "hack" for this situation. He merely took information made readily available because the people who gave it out are so unbelievable stupid they pretty much deserved it. Hell they asked for it.


Did you ever pass the reading comprehension classes in high school?

As much as they were dumb for pming the info and not deleting the pm's they did not ask for it. The info was not readily available there was no post, which could be seen by a multitude of people. He had to hack into private messages and search for it, which to be honest he didn't know was there unless, someone in the linkshell was working with him.


TheCastle wrote:

Furthermore Aikar, Ditch Taj like a bad habbit.
This piece of sh*t deserves no credit for anything good and I hope the @#%^er goes to god damn jail.


He is not going to jail, he isn't that big of a threat to be honest. Secondly he really did not break the law this second time. Arguably didn't break the law the first time, seeing it was only email and he did nothing with his personal info (that we know of)


TheCastle wrote:

Pull his untrusting *** off the team asap.
If he cant be trusted with stuff like the above you cannot trust him with ANYTHING ELSE.


You think this is the first time he has hacked? This is why he is on the team, he was able to "hack" his way on atomos. They knew he wasn't clean the whole time and fyi 95% chance this is not his first time.

TheCastle wrote:

Any person with a @#%^ing soul who deserves to exist would have seen the account information and still did nothing with them. All this proves is the asshat that he is will do what ever he can for attention if the opportunity presents itself.


To be honest, I use to support Taj even stood up for him per say before all the info came out. He would have kept them had he not been caught even with the trail, in my opinion. It is a game to him, he doesn't care about work because when s-e pulls the plug our your plug its all gone anyways.


TheCastle wrote:

Please I beg of you take his dumb *** off the windower team and disconnect all associations immediately..


It was his work as well. Just so you know windower is a hack of ffxi, so without his hacking skills your windower =/= exist.
#178 Sep 27 2007 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
***
1,235 posts
Seriously,
Taj has been "hacking" FFXI related stuff for how long now? It's never anything helpful, always something that can be detrimental. Under the guise of "showing weaknesses" in whatever he's up to atm (FFXI, POL, forum sites, ect) he's admitted to how much? That total is probably 10% of what he's really done. The law of probability and averages just finally caught up with him and he got caught.
In true Taj style he tried to paint it as a "lesson" calling all the stuff he stole retribution to gil buying accounts. Forgetting of course that while SE removes the gil from the game, he kept it for himself, he's tried to paint himself the "hero" again.
We are to believe that he found a LS that was naive enough to PM each other account info, he just happened to be surrepticiously going through peoples PM's (for very noble reasons I'm sure-perhaps looking for online predators!)and WOW, they ALL happened to be "gilbuyers".
Whatever.......
Taj has been up to no good for far longer than any of us know, he just finally got busted.
#179 Sep 27 2007 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:
he just finally got busted


The thing even if "busted"... I am not sure anything would change.

As someone said, people will still go to Taj for the update infos. The only way to stop Taj is people don't play hypocrisy in hacking and cheating in the game. People even spend RL bucks "donations" to get the latest tool for their Ridills... Think about that.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#180 Sep 27 2007 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
Restyoneck wrote:
Seriously,
Taj has been "hacking" FFXI related stuff for how long now? It's never anything helpful, always something that can be detrimental. Under the guise of "showing weaknesses" in whatever he's up to atm (FFXI, POL, forum sites, ect) he's admitted to how much? That total is probably 10% of what he's really done. The law of probability and averages just finally caught up with him and he got caught.
In true Taj style he tried to paint it as a "lesson" calling all the stuff he stole retribution to gil buying accounts. Forgetting of course that while SE removes the gil from the game, he kept it for himself, he's tried to paint himself the "hero" again.
We are to believe that he found a LS that was naive enough to PM each other account info, he just happened to be surrepticiously going through peoples PM's (for very noble reasons I'm sure-perhaps looking for online predators!)and WOW, they ALL happened to be "gilbuyers".
Whatever.......
Taj has been up to no good for far longer than any of us know, he just finally got busted.


A few of taj's friends as well as some people who had Taj as a hero after wiki, are trying to paint it as a lesson. Taj has more or less sat back laughed, not commented on the subject. He is sitting back and admiring his work, he wanted to be caught. A million ways to steal the roughly 90M? and items and never be touched.
#181 Sep 27 2007 at 9:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,067 posts
I think it is insane that Taj thought that financialy ruining "gil buyers" was a good idea. Way to go Taj... way to encourage them to buy more gil from RMT. Woot, mission successful Smiley: oyvey

Now to go change all my passwords just so I feel safer.
#182 Sep 27 2007 at 9:08 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Did you ever pass the reading comprehension classes in high school?

As much as they were dumb for pming the info and not deleting the pm's they did not ask for it. The info was not readily available there was no post, which could be seen by a multitude of people. He had to hack into private messages and search for it, which to be honest he didn't know was there unless, someone in the linkshell was working with him.



I only rated you down for this because you missed the point.

It doesn't matter if it was private messages you just don't ever give out your account info ever man thats stupid.

obviously Taj is desired for his hacking ability but hacking isn't always a negative thing. You have to combine negative intent with hacking to successfully turn it into something wrong.

Quote:
You think this is the first time he has hacked? This is why he is on the team, he was able to "hack" his way on atomos. They knew he wasn't clean the whole time and fyi 95% chance this is not his first time.


As far as I can tell he is a recent member to the team.
In spite of what he has to offer it appears it is nothing short of a mistake to bring him on any team where trust is important.
#183 Sep 27 2007 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
TheCastle wrote:



I only rated you down for this because you missed the point.

It doesn't matter if it was private messages you just don't ever give out your account info ever man thats stupid.


Read my first few posts where I point out how dumb it was to trust the system. I just don't feel that I must repeat my self in every post. Most people that debate on these threads, I would hope can retain the knowledge from post to post.


TheCastle wrote:

obviously Taj is desired for his hacking ability but hacking isn't always a negative thing. You have to combine negative intent with hacking to successfully turn it into something wrong.


This can be said about any skill. I go to EMT school, I have the knowledge to save people or inflict pain upon someone. Now I can misuse it or use it for good, regardless of intent I can skill damage someone with the best of intentions, the outcome is truly the thing people remember most.

TheCastle wrote:

As far as I can tell he is a recent member to the team.
In spite of what he has to offer it appears it is nothing short of a mistake to bring him on any team where trust is important.


I believe he has been there a decent amount of time, if any of the original authors are around they could clear it up. This has nothing to do with windower other than his lose ties to the project.
#184 Sep 27 2007 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
***
2,885 posts
BastokFL wrote:
alphamone wrote:
DancerRonin wrote:
Quote:
What a great guy.


/cue Taj fanbois coming in defending him

Am i the only one that has read all of Taj's actions and identified them more as the actions of a internet sociopath than a robin hood?


no, i also quite often have seen that in Taj as well.


x8

Someday, though, Taj is going to **** off the wrong person...


Yup and when that day comes, and Taj is hauled off to prison, another person who is just like him will come out of the woodwork and fill his spot...
____________________________
Tummie - Garuda/Lakshmi (Retired)

Return1 argued with Mellowy and wrote:

Seriously, you won't be @#%^ing happy until SE releases a full sized Bahamut avatar you can @#%^ing ride and use to kill players that annoy you, one shot AV/PW/Shinryuu, and burn the FFXI nations to the @#%^ing ground for fun. All while actually restoring mp used instead of costing any.

#185 Sep 27 2007 at 9:20 AM Rating: Good
**
536 posts
TheCastle wrote:
Quote:
This is what happens when you kiss somebody's *** that much.


This is what happens when you give random @#%^ing people your @#%^ing account information you mother @#%^ing morons. This isn't even cool because he hacked it or did something interesting. This is just childish and retarded on so many levels. Hell I wouldn't even use the word "hack" for this situation. He merely took information made readily available because the people who gave it out are so unbelievable stupid they pretty much deserved it. Hell they asked for it.


I'm not even convinced you understood what I meant by the post of mine you quoted. I definitely am convinced that you are a very angry little thing.

Also, however irresponsible somebody may be for sharing their account info with trusted friends, it certainly doesn't justify them having their accounts hijacked and stolen from. What is odd about your post is that after having said that these people are so stupid they deserve to be hacked, you then said:

TheCastle wrote:
Any person with a @#%^ing soul who deserves to exist would have seen the account information and still did nothing with them. All this proves is the asshat that he is will do what ever he can for attention if the opportunity presents itself.


Make up your mind, mate. Possibly calm down, too.
#186 Sep 27 2007 at 9:47 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
****
4,042 posts
This thread started being pointless after the semantics of analogies became more important than the actual event that occurred. It didn't happen to anyone here, there's nothing we can do about it. Taj stole something that wasn't his plain and simple. He didn't break into anyone's house, ruin anyone's life, or anything like that. It sucks, he's an ***, but I'm sure the people it happened to will get over it.
#187 Sep 27 2007 at 9:53 AM Rating: Excellent
I went to work today, just as this thread began. I was intrigued by the title, I started wading through the 25 pages or god knows how long it was but didn't read enough to get the entire picture and, as such, did not want to comment prematurely on something without getting complete story. I thought to myself however, some how, some way, as black and white as it is, this will get turned into a debate.

This time there was no provocation, there was no justification, there was no ambiguity, there was only an individual who did something hurtful to people that did not deserve it. The only question that remained was, what was the argument going to be about?

Of course it was obvious, I should have seen it, the argument generated on the victims (perceived) negligence.

Whether or not the parties victimized were negligent or not, it is irrelevant to the morality of the perpetrator's action.

Don't get me wrong, there were many people in this side-argument that handled it very well, I would have done the same as many of you, some even tried to get the focus back on the main issue but...

Rimesume, you could have ended that debate so long ago and saved so much unneccessary and pointless arguing so discussion about the actual issue could take place.

Whether they are negligent is debatable, whether they are RESPONSIBLE is not. I do try and remain objective but I am frustrated that Rimesume would transform the entire thread discussion from the immorality of the protaganist to the debatable negligence of the victims. And then you post this, like a buried nugget (idk why no one commented on it)...

Rimesume wrote:
People on the Internet are nothing more than digital pictures represented by language characters (in this case, between you and I, English Language). It means nothing to me to call someone a douche, nor does it mean anything to me if someone on the Internet doesn't like me.

The beauty of the Internet is to act like a complete *** and walk away from it.


This is such a limited perspective, you are only seeing what your instinct and society has planted in your head, you aren't using your brain to see past what is accepted. You speak of digital pictures and language characters so I assume you are trying to be technical? Okay, let's do it properly.

Quote:
People on the internet are real people using a medium of communication (like any other, it is merely a means with which to communicate) via digital pictures and language characters (in this case, between you and I, English Language). However, on the internet you are posting under a pseudonym, thereby acting virtually annonymously (god I wish I had a dictionary). This allows for reduced or no responsibilities for one's actions.

The beauty of the internet for some people is apparently the ability to act like a complete ***/hurt other people/rob people of a f*ckload of their hard earned time and effort because as you are acting annonymously often times you will not have to deal with the repercussions of your immoral actions. Instead, you can walk away from it


Some people don't do the wrong things out of morality, others out of fear of reprisal, don't get the two confused.

One of the things that really sh*ts me off, but also that I find the most intriging on this website is all the justification for clearly immoral actions.

Many people very much take the attitude of:

Quote:
"Right" is what you can get away with.


Here's a priceless one:

Quote:
It's the internet!!!!!


It is blatantly obvious what this Taj clown did was wrong, and purely out of the human instinct to attempt to prove his self worth and the desire to gain the attention of others.

No one has the balls to come out and say otherwise and justify Taj's actions, because due to the internet's popularity, even people's pseudonyms are valuable to them and as such, there would be some form of conseqence. Instead, it appears some people would rather nibble at the edges and poke at it with a stick.

Edit: this took me some time to write, I am probably breaking up the current argument

2nd edit: FYI, I, personally, would not give out my account information. But that is beside the issue.


Edited, Sep 27th 2007 2:04pm by kechup
#188 Sep 27 2007 at 9:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Guenny wrote:
This thread started being pointless after the semantics of analogies became more important than the actual event that occurred. It didn't happen to anyone here, there's nothing we can do about it. Taj stole something that wasn't his plain and simple. He didn't break into anyone's house, ruin anyone's life, or anything like that. It sucks, he's an ***, but I'm sure the people it happened to will get over it.


If I had 4 years worth of game progress dumped down the toilet, id say that would be at the top of my list for "Ruining my life", considering games are one of my major hobbies.

And before you say get a life or whatever, I really don't care. I like my game. There are plenty of people online that put a lot of stock into a game. Its the way the game is designed. Hell, even on a single player game...if i played it for a few months trying to beat it, then someone I barely knew walked up and broke the game in half then smashed my system, I'd at the very least have a very ruined few months or so till i saved up enough time/money to get that **** back.

You don't mess with other peoples lives just because you want to. That **** is messed up. And thats the real issue here.
#189 Sep 27 2007 at 9:59 AM Rating: Default
Also in Windower site:

LL's author is Taj, does that mean LL users need to be careful only?
#190 Sep 27 2007 at 10:08 AM Rating: Excellent
**
283 posts
No, Starhawk has worked with the source of LL also, and I also just inspected the DLL myself and there is no network function calls being made.

Taj's current plugins are safe to use.
#191 Sep 27 2007 at 10:13 AM Rating: Default
Blacktuesday wrote:
Guenny wrote:
This thread started being pointless after the semantics of analogies became more important than the actual event that occurred. It didn't happen to anyone here, there's nothing we can do about it. Taj stole something that wasn't his plain and simple. He didn't break into anyone's house, ruin anyone's life, or anything like that. It sucks, he's an ***, but I'm sure the people it happened to will get over it.


If I had 4 years worth of game progress dumped down the toilet, id say that would be at the top of my list for "Ruining my life", considering games are one of my major hobbies.

And before you say get a life or whatever, I really don't care. I like my game. There are plenty of people online that put a lot of stock into a game. Its the way the game is designed. Hell, even on a single player game...if i played it for a few months trying to beat it, then someone I barely knew walked up and broke the game in half then smashed my system, I'd at the very least have a very ruined few months or so till i saved up enough time/money to get that sh*t back.

You don't mess with other peoples lives just because you want to. That sh*t is messed up. And thats the real issue here.


Gaming =/= Real life.

4 years of gaming was not ruined at all, if it had been the Aegis and Annihilator would have been dropped. Taj would have not given all the items back. No I am not defending his actions but alot of what is being said is over the top. No disrespect to you Blacktuesday, if the aegis and annihilator was dropped this would be a whole different story all together.

#192 Sep 27 2007 at 10:17 AM Rating: Decent
Haha. What do you think about Taj now? Everyone was hailing him as "robin hood" last week. Now he has been exposed for the petty thief he is.

Quite a good laugh at all the idiots who defended his actions involving Wiki and then he goes and does this.

Literally LOL
#193 Sep 27 2007 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
SevIfrit wrote:
Blacktuesday wrote:
Guenny wrote:
This thread started being pointless after the semantics of analogies became more important than the actual event that occurred. It didn't happen to anyone here, there's nothing we can do about it. Taj stole something that wasn't his plain and simple. He didn't break into anyone's house, ruin anyone's life, or anything like that. It sucks, he's an ***, but I'm sure the people it happened to will get over it.


If I had 4 years worth of game progress dumped down the toilet, id say that would be at the top of my list for "Ruining my life", considering games are one of my major hobbies.

And before you say get a life or whatever, I really don't care. I like my game. There are plenty of people online that put a lot of stock into a game. Its the way the game is designed. Hell, even on a single player game...if i played it for a few months trying to beat it, then someone I barely knew walked up and broke the game in half then smashed my system, I'd at the very least have a very ruined few months or so till i saved up enough time/money to get that sh*t back.

You don't mess with other peoples lives just because you want to. That sh*t is messed up. And thats the real issue here.


Gaming =/= Real life.

4 years of gaming was not ruined at all, if it had been the Aegis and Annihilator would have been dropped. Taj would have not given all the items back. No I am not defending his actions but alot of what is being said is over the top. No disrespect to you Blacktuesday, if the aegis and annihilator was dropped this would be a whole different story all together.



No disrespect taken. I'm just saying, if it had happened to me, me losing even just my buyable gear would be a major hit to my happiness, particularly in game, so you (not you in particular sevifrit, i mean people in general), shouldn't decide that, "Ok, Taj was ok cause those people can get stuff back, it didn't ruin their life."

You should be thinking "Is it ok for someone else to decide what to do with your stuff." Anyone who tries to change that argument here is trying to help Taj dodge the bullet imo.
#194 Sep 27 2007 at 10:29 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,067 posts
Blacktuesday wrote:
Guenny wrote:
This thread started being pointless after the semantics of analogies became more important than the actual event that occurred. It didn't happen to anyone here, there's nothing we can do about it. Taj stole something that wasn't his plain and simple. He didn't break into anyone's house, ruin anyone's life, or anything like that. It sucks, he's an ***, but I'm sure the people it happened to will get over it.


If I had 4 years worth of game progress dumped down the toilet, id say that would be at the top of my list for "Ruining my life", considering games are one of my major hobbies.

And before you say get a life or whatever, I really don't care. I like my game. There are plenty of people online that put a lot of stock into a game. Its the way the game is designed. Hell, even on a single player game...if i played it for a few months trying to beat it, then someone I barely knew walked up and broke the game in half then smashed my system, I'd at the very least have a very ruined few months or so till i saved up enough time/money to get that sh*t back.

You don't mess with other peoples lives just because you want to. That sh*t is messed up. And thats the real issue here.


If it were me I would sue him, Altana knows how many lawyers I have in the family Smiley: frown It may not have been a car that he stole, but it was something that other people spent time and money on, therefore giving it a personal value. You can argue that digital items have no real world value and therefore are exempt, but then why do we have RMT? However, I do think that the victims would have a good civil suit and could be awarded punitive damages. In a way(though this is practically hyperbole), you could compare this to the OJ's Simpson muder trial, where he was acquitted of the muders, but lost a civil case and was found liable.

Edited, Sep 27th 2007 11:31am by TonberryOverlord
#195 Sep 27 2007 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
*
191 posts
This is too funny Taj has gone from hero to zero in no time flat. Hope this is a lesson learned to as how people should be wary when supporting unethical people who only truly carry out their own agendas. Some of the worst people in history are reveled as heros by the masses only to be found out that it was the point of their agenda to bolster support for their own ego purposes.

I can say until now i had no feeling one way or another about taj. In fact I was skeptical at best about his motives. Now though I know all he is a emo teen. Hope you taj lovers haven't had your hearts broken too much. Otherwise LOL really LOL.
#196 Sep 27 2007 at 10:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Also, however irresponsible somebody may be for sharing their account info with trusted friends, it certainly doesn't justify them having their accounts hijacked and stolen from. What is odd about your post is that after having said that these people are so stupid they deserve to be hacked, you then said:


Nobody deserves to have their account hacked like that. Its wrong no matter how you slice it.

anyway I clearly dont know enough about this topic so I should maybe just stfu.

meh..
#197 Sep 27 2007 at 10:43 AM Rating: Default
CometTail wrote:
Haha. What do you think about Taj now? Everyone was hailing him as "robin hood" last week. Now he has been exposed for the petty thief he is.

Quite a good laugh at all the idiots who defended his actions involving Wiki and then he goes and does this.

Literally LOL


Regardless of this incident, what Taj did uncover was good. The means to his discovery were not to be applauded, most of BG if this is who you are referring to also discouraged the means of which the information was required.

Means are not always proper to uncover any information, as one who supported Taj's info he gave us I was on the side the hacking was not right, I was let down he would do something this retarded but he wanted to get caught for some reason.

Blacktuesday wrote:


No disrespect taken. I'm just saying, if it had happened to me, me losing even just my buyable gear would be a major hit to my happiness, particularly in game, so you (not you in particular sevifrit, i mean people in general), shouldn't decide that, "Ok, Taj was ok cause those people can get stuff back, it didn't ruin their life."

You should be thinking "Is it ok for someone else to decide what to do with your stuff." Anyone who tries to change that argument here is trying to help Taj dodge the bullet imo.


I am in the same camp, I just lost my mule account last week. Shared with a friend who is overseas atm. The information was on his computer, his sister downloaded everything our mule account and his main account are gone, as well as various personal information of his. I lost 15,500 in currency for aegis, and about 35M in gil. He lost everything, was/am I mad/pissed/upset yes I am.

Even tho Taj did give things back I am not in the camp saying it was ok, I think Taj ****** up. I am not going to support him, but also not going to write him off either. He has given the community alot, so I am willing to not write him off completely but not willing to go to bat for him either.

Sadly there is no bullet. This is the internet, he could make a whole new character and just walk away, or get lost in the server transfers. There will be no legal action. He was already removed from BG Wiki, irc, and his linkshell.



TonberryOverlord wrote:


If it were me I would sue him, Altana knows how many lawyers I have in the family Smiley: frown It may not have been a car that he stole, but it was something that other people spent time and money on, therefore giving it a personal value. You can argue that digital items have no real world value and therefore are exempt, but then why do we have RMT? However, I do think that the victims would have a good civil suit and could be awarded punitive damages. In a way(though this is practically hyperbole), you could compare this to the OJ's Simpson muder trial, where he was acquitted of the muders, but lost a civil case and was found liable.

Edited, Sep 27th 2007 11:31am by TonberryOverlord



You could not sue Taj for anything he has done to those accounts. You do not own nor have any rights with those accounts. They are property of Square-Enix. People have attempted to sue over a video game and some have won in from other MMO's, I can cite some if needed. The way FFXI's policy is written you can not sue anyone over an account or any work put into them, i.e. why they can't be sold on ebay.
#198 Sep 27 2007 at 10:46 AM Rating: Good
**
283 posts
Quote:
Sadly, I saw this coming. I don't know what they were thinking when they allowed Taj on the team. Maybe Starhawk was desperate for help after alienating Wiccaan.


I wanted to also comment on this..

This was no where near the case, and to clear confusion, Wiccaan was not even involved with the actual windower project barely any at all. Wiccaan was sort of the same position I am, plugins/forums/irc. He had the source to it, but did not contribute/add much/anything to it at all.

So no, It had nothing to do with desperate for help as he was already 1 manning it to begin with, it was because Taj is an experienced programmer, he had the knowledge to make some great plugins, and starhawk saw him as capable of adding some good code to windower to furthur improve the program.

Taj added a large portion of the code for 3.3 involving the new plugin api updates. he helped out tremendously. as I said and everyone knows, hes skilled, and can be a great help.

Just note that Starhawk is doing whats best for the windower project with what ever choices he makes, he will make sure the users are safe at all times.

#199 Sep 27 2007 at 10:46 AM Rating: Good
**
267 posts
lol this reminds me of the beginning of BoF III. Three unsuspecting youths follow the mountaineer Bunyan's advice and take down the Nue. They are praised as heroes. Now a shady figure asks them for their next big deed. And they go to take down the tax-hiking mayor. They take him down, but are not praised as heroes, they are instead shunned, and ultimately left for dead.

Damn, now I want to play BoF III again XD
#200 Sep 27 2007 at 10:47 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,245 posts
Quote:
This is too funny Taj has gone from hero to zero in no time flat. Hope this is a lesson learned to as how people should be wary when supporting unethical people who only truly carry out their own agendas. Some of the worst people in history are reveled as heros by the masses only to be found out that it was the point of their agenda to bolster support for their own ego purposes.


How is he a hero? As far as I'm concerned the guy is only 1 of a few people working on windower. He is no hero to me, and that whole ffxiclopedia thing he uncovered, we'll I could care less. The site was gonna be bought out eventually anyways, only a ****** would donate to a site when they know damn we'll that they'll need to host more and more fundraisers to keep going on. For that, I might as well come to these free sites.
#201 Sep 27 2007 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
***
2,885 posts
scchan wrote:
I do not need hack info of the next patch, I want Taj to be gone.


Just wanted to clear up the common misconception about Taj getting update info out fairly quickly. You can download any update the moment the server goes down and pretty much have a congestion free download leaving more time to .DAT mine information while everyone else is waiting for the <Check Version> button to appear. Trust me, it isn't a hack. You can even do it on a PS2.
____________________________
Tummie - Garuda/Lakshmi (Retired)

Return1 argued with Mellowy and wrote:

Seriously, you won't be @#%^ing happy until SE releases a full sized Bahamut avatar you can @#%^ing ride and use to kill players that annoy you, one shot AV/PW/Shinryuu, and burn the FFXI nations to the @#%^ing ground for fun. All while actually restoring mp used instead of costing any.

This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 231 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (231)