1
Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

ITT: OoT: R and R.Follow

#1 Feb 09 2007 at 7:34 AM Rating: Good
OoT: Rules and Regulations~

OoT#1:There will be no more stupid Fight Club references in OoT, ever. The OoT does NOT talk about Fight Club. Submitted by Senjiow

OoT#2: You can not “claim”, “get” or “steal” a page on an EDIT.

OoT#3: You can not call a poster with a larger post count then you, “nub”, “n00b”, or “newb” (and any other variation therein) in a DING thread.

OoT#4: Ding Threads are made at 1K, 4K (because of Star Activation) 5K and 10K. After 10K, Ding all you want. No one cares about you any more.

OoT#5: If at anytime a poster challenges your current avatar and you are known to have had a bewbs avatard previously, you must comply in 5 posts and revert back to said bewbs for at least 25 (non-Smiley: spam, non-journal) posts.

OoT#6: More then one animal in a single post causes Zootoxicpostism. EX: Smiley: goat can not proceed Smiley: llama and vice versa.

OoT#7:Once a thread has been de-railed, re-railing it back on topic, on the same page, is off limits and punishable by death. Addendum ~ To de-rail a thread it must be non-legendary status. Submitted by TheDakster, now know as just Dak. Addendum by Hellboy

OoT#8:Only pointless threads shall be stickied. For months at a time. For no reason. At all. Submitted by Senjiow

OoT#9: Usagichan is the only with the power to call Legendary. Submitted by Hellboy

OoT#10: (Used to be forum##) threads always suck. Stop moving them here. Submitted by Hellboy Otherwise known as Alla's garbage can.

OoT#11: Birthdays or other celebrations do not exist until a mandatory CJ has happened. Submitted by Dorsa

OoT#12: If you start a "Hay everyone! Entertain me!" attention ***** thread, you are not allowed to leave your computer for no less than four hours. Momentary pee, snack, or smoke breaks are acceptable, but should be no longer than 5 minutes. Submitted by Nixnot

So sayeth thy Herald.


The rest of the OoT: R and R shall be submitted in a orderly fashion by her fellow posters. Further inclusions shall be decided upon by The Herald and it's producers.






Edited, Jun 6th 2007 9:39am by Kaelesh
#2 Feb 09 2007 at 7:38 AM Rating: Good
I can abide by these rules.

However anyone that makes a Ding thread regarding post counts deserves to be called "nub", "noob", "newb" or anything else fitting that description. Yes, I've done it before and I fully expected the "Nub" calling. It's tradition! Smiley: grin
#3 Feb 09 2007 at 7:39 AM Rating: Decent
OoT#6 Once a thread has been derailed, putting it back on topic is off limits and punishable by death.
#4 Feb 09 2007 at 7:40 AM Rating: Decent
*
58 posts
Perhaps we need to sticky this...
#5 Feb 09 2007 at 7:40 AM Rating: Decent
TheDakster, Eater of Souls wrote:
OoT#6 Once a thread has been derailed, putting it back on topic is off limits and punishable by death.


At least Re-Railing it on the same page. Myself and the producers feel that it's unlikely that it won't be re-railed at some point in time.
#6 Feb 09 2007 at 7:41 AM Rating: Good
I believe ding threads are also made at 1234get and 1337 get and probably 4321get aswell. Since (not counting my own) I have seen these threads before.
#7 Feb 09 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,870 posts
OoT#7: Only pointless threads shall be stickied.
#8 Feb 09 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Smiley: motz Quit making rules. Rules stink!

Besided I'm coming up on 2k and you better believe I'm making a ding thread.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#9 Feb 09 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
*
58 posts
Quote:
OoT#7: Only pointless threads shall be stickied.


orly?
#10 Feb 09 2007 at 7:44 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,870 posts
YARLY!
#11 Feb 09 2007 at 7:45 AM Rating: Good
Yea, most of these rules fail anyway. And I imagine this thread will just get de-railed eventually anyway.
#12 Feb 09 2007 at 7:46 AM Rating: Decent
*
58 posts
nowai!
#13 Feb 09 2007 at 7:46 AM Rating: Decent
You just think they suck cause you didn't get one added so Smiley: tongue
#14 Feb 09 2007 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
One of my Guinea hens died yesterday. Got home from work and there it was all frozen solid in it's little house.

Like Anna Nicole, cause of death is not yet determined.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Feb 09 2007 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
No! You will not derail the OoT R an R!
#16 Feb 09 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Good
Sorry to hear that Elinda.
#17 Feb 09 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Elinda wrote:
Like Anna Nicole, cause of death is definately drug related.


Fisked.

Helping Elinda de-rail threads since...today.
#18 Feb 09 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
Senjiow wrote:
OoT#7: Only pointless threads shall be stickied.


You got it.

#19 Feb 09 2007 at 7:51 AM Rating: Decent
*
58 posts
OOT#8-- You don't talk about OOT.
OOT#9-- You don't talk about OOT.
#20 Feb 09 2007 at 7:52 AM Rating: Excellent
OoT#8: To de-rail a thread it must be non-legendary status.

OoT#9: Usagichan is the only with the power to call Legendary
#21 Feb 09 2007 at 7:52 AM Rating: Decent
Ignore them! Ignore them I say!
#22 Feb 09 2007 at 7:57 AM Rating: Decent
Hellboy the Hand wrote:
OoT#8: To de-rail a thread it must be non-legendary status.



More of an addendum for a previous rule.
#23 Feb 09 2007 at 7:58 AM Rating: Good
***
3,094 posts
Did I mention how hawt the girls were who work at the restaurant at which I supped last night? I think I may go back for lunch today and check out the daytime staff.

Oh yeah ... I challenge your jurisdiction to impose these regulations. You lack plenary power to unilaterally adopt new rules and doing so violates our right to procedural due process. The proper procedure is to post the proposed revisions, allow a period for public comment, then hold public hearings. Of course, that assumes that the putative regulatory body has been properly empowered to adopt and enforce rules. Without the appropriate Executive Order or Legislation granting you such power, we cannot be bound by any administrative precepts you ostensibly "enact" here.

So there!
#24 Feb 09 2007 at 7:59 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,870 posts
OoT#10: There will be no more stupid Fight Club references in OoT, ever.
#25 Feb 09 2007 at 8:01 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
OoT#10: There will be no more stupid Fight Club references in OoT, ever.



I second this rule! Fight club was a great movie but its annoying how everyone and their brother makes the first 2 rule joke and think they're witty.
#26 Feb 09 2007 at 8:02 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Quote:

OoT#10: There will be no more stupid Fight Club references in OoT, ever.





I second this rule! Fight club was a great movie but its annoying how everyone and their brother makes the first 2 rule joke and think they're witty.




Motion carried, any further reference to fight-club will end in decapitation.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 170 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (170)