1
Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Democrats are racistsFollow

#77 Jul 20 2010 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
What else ya got?

a President.
#78 Jul 20 2010 at 1:13 PM Rating: Excellent
It means anyone with half a clue of how the university system in the US works knows that "magna *** laude" = got damn good grades. It's Latin for "with high honors" and almost every professional school and university in the country reserves it for the students who were in the top 10% of their class, or graduated with a 3.75, depending on the institution. My husband was a magna *** laude from his PhD program, and had a 3.81.

The exact GPA isn't being released because Harvard thinks it's nobody's ******* business what the exact GPA of one of their magna *** laude graduates was, and that even if they did and it turned out to be only 3.8 instead of 4.0, there'd be conservatives ******** that he only got a B in his Survey of the American Legal System from 1960-1975 and a D in his Bowling Athletic Elective.
#79 Jul 20 2010 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Obama was not an experienced attorney, nor community organizer, nor politician, before he ran for president. What else ya got?


You tell me where I said that. At all. I said I knew his record. Try to not to extrapolate anything else out of those simple words.
#80 Jul 20 2010 at 1:22 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Let's face it in the Democrat party mexicans vote for mexicans, blacks for blacks, and whites for anyone who promises to steal from evil corporations to support green technology fantasies.


And republicans vote for the whitey who hates the darkies the most. I know you like playing the pot calling the liberal a n*gger-lover, but this is so obviously biased and racist that it's not fun. Except that I got to post "n*gger-lover".
#81 Jul 20 2010 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Obama was not an experienced [...] politician, before he ran for president.

Experienced enough to kick McCain's ***.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#82 Jul 20 2010 at 1:25 PM Rating: Good
I presume where you got this quote:

Quote:
Senior attorneys at the small firm where he worked say he was a strong writer and researcher, but was involved in relatively few cases -- about 30 -- and spent only four years as a full-time lawyer before entering politics.


Was from here, yes?

This "low" number of 3,723 billable hours means jackall for a junior associate. As does the number of cases they work.

You can try that **** with some other person whose wife isn't a lawyer. I know what they do.
#83 Jul 20 2010 at 1:31 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
What racists? The woman who, in the words of the farmer's wife, worked tirelessly and "kept us out of bankruptcy"? That racist?


She's a woman. Everyone knows that women don't much matter to conservatives.
#84 Jul 20 2010 at 1:39 PM Rating: Decent
Kaelesh,

Quote:
The guy sells pyramid insurance, you can doubt everything about him.


Smiley: laughSmiley: laugh It's sad you can vote; fortunately I have faith that you regularly get lost on your way there.

Pyramid insurance...Smiley: laugh That's priceless.



Cat,

Quote:
The exact GPA isn't being released because Harvard thinks it's nobody's @#%^ing business what the exact GPA of one of their magna *** laude graduates was, and that even if they did and it turned out to be only 3.8 instead of 4.0


What about a 2.0? And yes apparently grades are important to you liberal bedwetters; at least they were when W was in office. That's what's so humourus about this entire discussion. I care about what people have accomplished, it's you people who place so much weight on grades. The fact that Obama refuses to release eats away at you, you can't hide it. Obama is supposed to be this genius when chances are he probably barely had over a 2.0 and was only admitted because he was black.




#85 Jul 20 2010 at 1:40 PM Rating: Decent
Tulip,

And everyone knows that liberals are baby killers.

#86 Jul 20 2010 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
Kaelesh,

So you brag on his record as a practicing attorney even though he doesn't have record worth bragging about.

Sound about right?

#87 Jul 20 2010 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Tulip,

And everyone knows that liberals are baby killers.



Sure they do, dear.
#88 Jul 20 2010 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:

The fact that Obama refuses to release eats away at you, you can't hide it.
Eats away at who?

You're projecting again.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#89 Jul 20 2010 at 1:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Hahaha... the FOX story now is about how the mean ole administration pushed this innocent woman out of her job.

Naturally, no mention of how FOX was playing an edited video or why they were running with the story of this woman (back when she was an evil racist) without even trying to get the undoctored video or Sherrod's side of the story. Or why Andrew Breitbart was distributing video selectively edited to destroy this woman's career.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#90 Jul 20 2010 at 1:47 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
And what we come away with, again, from you and your lib buddies is you're willing to excuse racists as long as theyt're black.

What racists? The woman who, in the words of the farmer's wife, worked tirelessly and "kept us out of bankruptcy"? That racist?


Nope. She's not the issue, although the simple response is to focus entirely on her. The issue here is not her, but the NAACP and their reaction and support for what she was saying. This was in response to the NAACP making claims that the Tea Party was full of racists and needed to repudiate the racists in their midsts. The absurdity of an organization called the "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People", which has a charter and agenda specifically aimed at racially focused activities would have the gall to accuse the Tea Party, an organization entirely focused at big government and taxes and having nothing at all to do with race, a bunch of racists is overwhelming.

That's what this is supposed to be about. Making this about the woman in question is a way of minimizing the larger issue. We're looking at upside-down labels of racism and no one seems to bat an eye. Somewhere along the line we have accepted in our mainstream thoughts that it's ok for a group of black people to form together with the sole purpose of helping black people, but if a group of people with no color orientation at all forms, with an agenda having nothing to do with race at all, but happening to oppose a political party which the first group associates itself with, that group can label the other "racist". When did this happen? What the hell does the word "racist" mean? I'm pretty sure most of us don't agree with a definition that reads "When you do something a group of black people don't like", but that appears to be the working definition the NAACP is using.


It's the NAACP. Until they change their name, charter, agenda, and membership, they have no freaking case for calling anyone else racist. One should not even have to dig up footage of racist language being used at their events to understand this.

Edited, Jul 20th 2010 12:48pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#91 Jul 20 2010 at 1:51 PM Rating: Excellent
knoxxsouthy wrote:
So you brag on his record as a practicing attorney even though he doesn't have record worth bragging about.

Sound about right?


No. It doesn't sound anything close to being right. Either show me where I was "bragging" about his record as an attorney or shut your fucking knuckle-dragging mouth.
#92 Jul 20 2010 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
It's the NAACP. Until they change their name, charter, agenda, and membership, they have no freaking case for calling anyone else racist. One should not even have to dig up footage of racist language being used at their events to understand this.


****** A' man! Down with the LULAC and the CAPACD can **** right the **** off too.

Eat **** Gbaji.
#93 Jul 20 2010 at 1:59 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Nope. She's not the issue, although the simple response is to focus entirely on her.


So Varus is simple. Got it.
#94 Jul 20 2010 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Nope. She's not the issue

Of course she is. FOX's little Tea Party hero got a black eye for writing some some racist letter (posing as "satire") and so now the witch hunt is on to get the NAACP back. If that means destroying the career of a woman who saved some white guy's farm by smearing her as a racist with out of context video clips... let's do it!

Why do you think FOX & Breitbart were so eager to run that video without trying to obtain the entire footage (heh... as if Breitbart didn't edit it himself) or getting Sherrod's story first?

But hey! Sure! Let's say "This woman whose career was destroyed under the stampede to tear down the NAACP isn't really the issue"! She's just a forgettable casualty in the struggle to get those uppity NAACP folks back for exposing some Tea Party racists.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#95gbaji, Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 2:26 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph. She's being thrown under the bus by the NAACP and the Obama administration. If you watched any of the coverage of this, the primary focus was not on her, but on the reaction of the NAACP (or lack of one) while she was saying those things. It's not about the people specifically, it's about the acceptance of their words. Following on the heels of the DoJ determining that two uniform wearing black panther members standing in front of a voting place, one of them carrying a club, in clearly aggressive stances somehow didn't violate any election laws nor did it infringe anyone's right to vote, we're seeing a pattern here.
#96 Jul 20 2010 at 2:28 PM Rating: Decent
Jophed,

Did you hear what this lady said? I'm sorry that you're upset they didn't play her entire rant but that's beside the point. The fact is the lady is clearly a racist, regardless of whether or not she may have helped a white family out once. It's sad that you have to stoop so low as to defend this kind of person. But hey you defend Obama's blatant racism every day.



Edited, Jul 20th 2010 4:33pm by knoxxsouthy
#97gbaji, Posted: Jul 20 2010 at 2:33 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You're kidding, right? It was satire. Not "posing". He was writing what he believed the NAACP stood for in terms of race relations. He wrote a mock letter from the NAACP to Lincoln, attempting to highlight just how far off course they've gotten in their outlook on race. Did the letter contain racist language? Of course it did. But this was not about what he thinks about black people, but what he thinks the NAACP thinks of black people.
#98 Jul 20 2010 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent
Gbaji,

Quote:
What the hell do you think satire is?


Obviously it's whatever Colbert tells him it is.

#99 Jul 20 2010 at 2:37 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
1. Varus says something stupid
2. Everyone else lulz at him
3. Varus says something else stupid to try to not sound as stupid.
4. Everyone lulz again
5. Gbaji swoops in and defends varus.
6. Varus thinks he has won
7. ????
8. Profit.
#100 Jul 20 2010 at 2:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Joph. She's being thrown under the bus by the NAACP and the Obama administration.

She was. That was wrong and they should be offering her her job back.

But you're being ridiculously naive in what this is about. FOX's little Tea Party Express group -- the group FOX advertised for, promoted, roused up into cheers while pretending it was news, etc -- was expelled out of the Tea Party Federation after Mark Williams from the Express wrote a racist letter about the NAACP and pretended it was just humor. Now FOX has a stick up their *** and a chip on their shoulder that their golden Tea Party boy got embarrassed for being a blatant racist and what better way to get the NAACP back than by tearing down some of their people?

It's sad that you're so happy to give FOX and Breitbart a pass on this. Really obvious and predictable but still sad. It's also sad that you seem to have no problem with FOX tearing down a woman's career based on edited video because they're harboring some vendetta. Again, predictable but still sad. Keep saying that she's not important though and we just don't understand it.

Quote:
Following on the heels of the DoJ determining that two uniform wearing black panther members standing in front of a voting place, one of them carrying a club, in clearly aggressive stances somehow didn't violate any election laws nor did it infringe anyone's right to vote

I understand you want to change the subject and I get that you don't really understand the case, its history or the decision but you don't need to parrot everything you hear.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#101 Jul 20 2010 at 2:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxxsouthy wrote:
I'm sorry that you're upset they didn't play her entire rant but that's beside the point.

Hahahahahaha

You're so cute when you're trying so hard.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 275 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (275)