icon Evoker's Doublet  

Auction House: Armor - Body

Evoker's Doublet
[Body] All RacesLv.58 SMN
Submit a Fashion Shot

Submit a correction

Used in Quests:Gained from Quests:
Post Comment
Evoker's doublet
# Mar 15 2006 at 12:58 PM Rating: Decent
17 posts
Temple of Ugg coffer
Posted @ Tue, Mar 14th 8:46 PM 2006
By: Sleave
2 posts
Score: Decent [3.00] Just got this the other day on 1st try.

It was sunday mornning and i was feeling lucky!
Went in buffed up as 58 smn, took out carby and used snk oils/prism powders. Opened 1st gate zoned to temple checked 3 spots. Was in 3rd spot next to empty room. Sleave obtains Evoker's doublet! ^^ WooHoo!

Good luck^^

Bahamut server 75blm 58smn 42rdm 38whm

Diablos = O Fenrir = O


Evoker's Doublet +1
# Nov 20 2005 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
84 posts
mmk, I just saw the HQ of one of these.

Level to use: 74
Defence: 35
MP: 45
Avatar Elemental Resistance: 25
Blood Pact Delay: -4
MP while healing: 5
Autotranslated text: {Evk. Doublet +1}

If anyone knows how to make/obtain this item, please tell me or post it on the page for it when it's posted by alla.
RE: Evoker's Doublet +1
# Nov 22 2005 at 6:06 AM Rating: Good
329 posts
All AF+1 pieces come from sea, at least indirectly. In sea there are areas known as Limbus, something of a mini-Dynamis. Collect a couple Rare/Ex items and a certain amount of the special Ancient currency from Limbus (much less than a Dynamis relic weapon, don't sweat!) and an NPC can upgrade your AF to +1.
Avatar: Enmity- is the AVATAR'S ENMITY
# Nov 04 2005 at 11:01 AM Rating: Good
329 posts
Confirmed in a recent SE interview: na.square-enix.com/events/ffxi/tour2005/tx/transcript.html

FFXI Stratics: One of the biggest debates in the summoner community deals with the stat found on the artifact armor "avatar: enmity: -". Who receives this effect?

Sage Sundi: The enmity status is related to the avatar, not to the summoner. It's useful to use "avatar: enmity+" when you want your avatar to keep the hate.
Mystery of Element Solved
# Oct 26 2005 at 2:00 AM Rating: Decent
27 posts
Most people agree know now what the "Avatar elemental resistance +20" means but I got my friend who has this peice to clear it up for me.

You gain +20 resist to the element of your avatar. (IE Summon shiva and your ice resist goes up 20) We know this because when she summoned shiva and went to the equipment screen her ice resist visiably went up by 20.

I can't say why SE phrased some things "XXX: yyy" on our AF and this without the colon, but I can at least say what the elemental resistance really is for.

I really hope this clears things up for people as I didn't trust any of the things people said until she confirmed that her resistance went up by 20 when viewing the equipment screen. (much like the whm ba- spells do)

hmmm...this doesn't add up...
# Sep 09 2005 at 6:24 PM Rating: Decent
Im kinda confused, if the ":" is supposed to mean "Cause-effect" then why do people say that the elemantal resistance is for the summoner when there is clearly no ":" for that one..would that mean your avatars get all resit +20, becuse to me, it says nothing about the day effects it, or it depends on if you have a certaint avatar out..cuz there is nothing that directly says that having an avatar out effects your resitance..and if its been proven that that statement DOES infact increase your resistance depending on the avatar summoned, thent the credibility of the -emnity "cuase-effect" goes down the drain.. becuse it has to be one or the other, why would they make it say the same thing two diffrent ways? so if its "Avatar: Emnity -2" translates into " if you have an avatar summoned then the summoner gets -2 emnity" THEN becuse there is no cause or effect statement meaning ":" then the "avatar elemental reistance +20" means the AVATARS get it, NOT US! and if the "avatar elmental resistance +20" means WE get the +20 reistance based on our summoned avatar, then the ":" means the AVATARS get -emnity, NOT US! it just dosent work both ways, i dont have the armor, so i cant test either theory, but my statement makes sense, and belive me, i wish both of them were for teh summoner and not the avatar,but its time to look at the reality of the situation.
RE: hmmm...this doesn't add up...
# Sep 21 2005 at 11:05 AM Rating: Default
The statement "Avatar elemental resistance +20" means that the avatars elemental resistance raises 20 points. The statement "Avatar:Emnity-2" means that when an avatar is out, you (the summoner) get -2 Emnity. If it said "Avatar: Elemental resistance +20" (note the ":") then when one of your Avatars were out you would get +20 elemental resistance.
Enmity Issue
# Sep 09 2005 at 10:44 AM Rating: Default
The -Enmity on this gear is clearly applied directly to the Summoner himself/herself. It is activated when the Summoner has out any Avatar, I doubt however, that this includes Spirit pacts since it says, "Avatar". The ":" notation is used to describe a cause and effect relationship between the variables on either side of the equasion. "Avatar:Enmity-2" directly translates to "CAUSE [Avatar active]->EFFECT [Enmity decreased two points]. If this notation is difficult to grasp, for whatever reason, think of it as an, "If-Then" situation. "If" the Summoner with this particular gear equiped has any Avatar actually summoned, "Then" that Summoner's Enmity is reduced by two. No other factors apply. Please think rationally about this. There is no possible benifit from reducing an Avatars Enmity. Claiming that not turning a Mob via powerful Blood Pact durring a SATA attempt is a benifit to Avatar Enmity reduction is a ludicris notion. Almost as completely insane as if one were to lower the enmity on a "Provoke" equiped job so that they could "Provoke" durring a SATA attempt and not turn the mob. This is because someone wouldn't "Provoke" durring a SATA attempt. Just as a Black Mage wouldn't nuke, and a White Mage wouldn't cast "Benediction", a Summoner would not, or at least (and this goes for the other examples as well) should not cast a powerful, possibly hate changing spell at the very moment when hate control is most crutial.
# Jul 05 2005 at 4:21 AM Rating: Decent
114 posts
Expect to shout in Jeuno for a while and shell out some gil if your LS can't help you get the coffer key. =\ You'd probably be better off farming for Austere than you would paying people to get this for you unless you want it as part of your collection.
# May 15 2005 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
its a pretty color GREEN!

btw first post[Green][/Green]
i like
# May 15 2005 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
its a pretty color GREEN!

btw first post
# May 13 2005 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
539 posts
I really need to upgrade this armor to something else. How long should I wait till I switch out this armor?
RE: Just to clear it up...
# Apr 30 2005 at 7:52 PM Rating: Decent
I think you guys are right... I mean, if the Avatars got -enmity instead of the Summoner themselves, wouldn't it say "Avatar Enmity -X" instead of "Avatar: Enmity-X" ?
Note the " : " used, it definitely loweres the enmity for the Summoner. Rate up Mishaela
. ^^
Just to clear it up...
# Apr 04 2005 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
279 posts
This, along with the horn and gloves, contain the text read as...
Avatar: Enmity -(#)

This does NOT lower the avatar's enmity. It lower the summoner's enmity if he/she has an avatar out.
RE: Just to clear it up...
# Apr 26 2005 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
rate up i've had so many people argue that point w/ me and they can't get it through their head
Smiley: yippee
RE: Just to clear it up...
# Apr 08 2005 at 9:52 PM Rating: Decent
are you sure? i have never heard this theory
RE: Just to clear it up...
# Apr 10 2005 at 4:19 AM Rating: Good
279 posts
Three summoners I know (all 70+) have confirmed to me that that's how the enmity on these work.
RE: Just to clear it up...
# Apr 18 2005 at 3:59 PM Rating: Default
77 posts
Mishaela is right. Check http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/db/jobs.html?fjob=15&mid=111354910777505067&num=21
body + gloves works
# Apr 03 2005 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
1,546 posts
so you gonna fight bombs or gobs,

Call ifrit with AF body and gloves. Ifrit lets you survive bomb hits a bit better with resistance enhancement.

Gloves convert fire damage ifrit takes to MP for you. A helpful if limited situational effect.
Avatar Enmity -2 ><
# Dec 19 2004 at 3:09 AM Rating: Decent
Thats such BS that it gives Avatar enmity -2 instead of +2 out of our whole AF only 2 pieces give us enmity -2. With all the main healing I do I need it more then Carbuncle >< especially when I'm farming. Really these things should give less chance of Spell Interuption like all the other mage AF.
RE: Avatar Enmity -2 ><
# Feb 03 2005 at 3:08 PM Rating: Default
What's more BS? Having Avatar Enmity-2... or having a SMN being Main Healer? I guess SMN Main Healer is more BS...
RE: Avatar Enmity -2 ><
# Apr 19 2005 at 11:38 PM Rating: Decent
summoners are used for main healers we dont just buff and nuke if theres no whm in the party the next person up is smn that is if you have a whm sub ;P
Avatar Enmity -2 ><
# Dec 19 2004 at 3:07 AM Rating: Decent
double Post

Edited, Sun Dec 19 03:09:45 2004
Evoker's doublet
# Nov 06 2004 at 1:50 AM Rating: Decent
Just in case people aren't sure,

this adds +20 to YOUR elemental resistance depending on what avatar you have out.

ex. Ifrit gives you Fire+20 elemental resistance.
JSE above all @_@;
# Oct 19 2004 at 1:07 AM Rating: Decent
886 posts
If you have a choice between this and Austere, Austere body piece is still much better :/.
RE: JSE above all @_@;
# Dec 23 2004 at 11:52 AM Rating: Default
***** both im wearing my daunde cotehardie :D
RE: JSE above all @_@;
# Dec 11 2004 at 10:16 AM Rating: Default
thanks captin obvious
worth it
# Oct 12 2004 at 9:51 PM Rating: Decent
226 posts
I'd rather get this for free then scrape up 600k for an austere robe (Gilgamesh) ^^.
Worth it?
# Sep 20 2004 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
In all reality, is this any better than the Austere Robe?

I'd rather have -1 Perpetuation and -3 BP timer than avatar resistance.

Unless it's refering to the rate at which the avatar itself get's resisted on an offensive bloodpact. But I'm pretty sure that isn't the case.

Edited, Mon Sep 20 12:08:33 2004
RE: Worth it?
# Nov 20 2004 at 7:35 AM Rating: Default
739 posts
Well the -enmity is nice especially when more often than not the SMN is main healing (* * )

I would suggest to swap both pieces in.

in your Summon macroes have like
/ma Fenrir <me>
/equip main "Pluto's Staff"
/equip Hands "Carbuncle Mitts"
/equip Body "Austere Robe"
/equip Head "Austere Hat"

and your release macro be something like
/pet Release <me>
/equip main "Pluto's Staff"
/equip Hands "Evoker's Bracers"
/equip Head "Gold Hairpin"
/equip Body "Evoker's Doublet"

Alternating between the 2 is awsome because you get the benefits from all sides xD

Edited, Sat Nov 20 22:55:09 2004
RE: Worth it?
# Dec 06 2004 at 2:04 PM Rating: Decent
134 posts
It's "Avatar: Enmity -2", not plain "Enmity -2", If you've ever tried soloing anything as a summoner you'll understand why this is an extremely bad thing. It reduces the hate your avatar gets, not you and really any hit your avatar takes is a nice bonus in a normal exp party, as you don't have to heal it. And if it's not keeping aggro off you solo then you've got serious problems.

All in all.. this thing seems worse than useless =/

Get yourself a austere robe, or vermillion cloak instead if you've got the money
# Jun 29 2004 at 4:07 PM Rating: Default
The stats on this are incorrect; the correct ones are:

Defense 35, MP +15, MND +3, Enmity -2, Avatar Elemental Resistance +20

Hope this helps people who might be confused (since summoning magic skill +20 would make this far and away the best body armor in the game for SMN...).
RE: Correction
# Feb 21 2005 at 8:59 AM Rating: Good
440 posts
It's Avatar: Enmity -2.. It reduces hate for your avatar, not you...
about time
# May 05 2004 at 11:44 PM Rating: Default
It's about time they finally added this.
RE: about time
# May 06 2004 at 12:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
14,661 posts
We rely on submitted information to tell us where the big holes in the DB are so submit it next time! :)
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking


RE: about time
# Jul 30 2004 at 10:24 AM Rating: Decent
hey are u the one that took all dem pictures of the npcs in the city? pikko?
RE: about time
# Jan 11 2005 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
634 posts
See by her name where it says Administrator.

RE: about time
# Jan 11 2005 at 2:32 PM Rating: Good
634 posts
grr, double post

Edited, Tue Jan 11 14:37:24 2005
Post Comment

Free account required to post

You must log in or create an account to post messages.