gbaji wrote:
Forest and trees Joph. Read the whole blog. If his point is just to call her a racist to get her fired, why on earth spend 8 paragraphs talking about the NAACP and how they have been attacking the Tea Party on the issue of race because they have failed to "denounce the racism in their midst"?
Who said that? His point was to smear her as a racist so he could smear others as racists. And then say "Gee! I didn't mean to for anyone to call Sherrod a racist... just because I state in plain letters that she's a racist!"
Even more telling is the intro he gave this on YouTube. So while you crow and holler about the "Context!" of a blog entry, the video itself which is still viewable by millions outside of the blog happily introduces itself by saying "Hey, get a load of this racist ***** working for the government and hating white people!" But that doesn't bother you. Of course not. Because the context matters! Especially when describing hacked up videos taken out of context and given intros slandering people (which only work when you watch the video out of context).
Quote:
No, it wasn't. It was precisely in context.
Hahahaha... yeah. That's why the unedited video shows it completely differently and lacks this so called "agreement" and "laughter". You really think they're sitting there saying "Haha! Fu
ck whitey!"? Of course, you're the tool who insisted that they didn't know how the story would end when the unedited video has her saying
exactly what the story is about. Nice try though.
Quote:
He never once called her a racist (present tense).
Andrew Breitbart wrote:
Ms. Sherrod admits
that in her federally
appointed position,
overseeing over a
billion dollars...
She discriminates
against people
due to their race.
Maybe you and I have radically different ideas of what a "racist" is. Or whether or not "she discriminates" is in the present tense.
Or maybe you're just this desperate. I'm guessing the second one.
Edit: I see that since Breitbart was exposed as the racist lying hack he is, he's tried to cover his *** by throwing up an annotation on the YouTube video saying this story happened a while ago. Of course, he still says in the video that "she discriminates against people due to their race."
Edited, Jul 21st 2010 6:51pm by Jophiel